So, what did you like and dislike about the culture of your last company? So with Gallagher, I love the people I worked with. I'm still friendly with them. I really enjoyed working with everybody I worked with, from assistants to managers to the COO of the branch. I liked getting exposure to things I hadn't before. For example, captives. My prior employer was a little bit small to deal with captives. We pitched a couple, but we didn't have any in place, but at Gallagher they did. But Gallagher, ultimately, there were two things. I had sort of signed up to be in more of a real estate slash mixed bag sort of a role, and I ended up very focused on higher ed, which I just felt like was a little bit narrow of a niche for me career-wise. You don't see a lot of postings for higher ed brokers, so I didn't want to get too far down that path until you can't get out of it, essentially. And then with higher ed, there's only two markets that do it. You send everything to them. It's a little bit, you know, maybe in six months it'll be careful what you wish for, but there wasn't a lot of opportunities to really distinguish yourself or what have you with that kind of environment. And then also Gallagher was, I would say, hyper-bureaucratic, very, very bureaucratic, which I'm not uncomfortable with. I do have a poly-sci degree. I'm fine with some red tape, but Gallagher was just a little bit too much in that direction for me. It was too often an obstacle, I found. And then with how large Gallagher is, you've got to talk to somebody in Chicago to kind of overcome that obstacle, and that was a little bit difficult. So with my prior employer, they were very small. With Gallagher, they were very large, and I'm kind of looking for a little bit of a Goldilocks situation. But from what I understand, York and Gallagher are probably the two extreme ends of that spectrum, so that shouldn't be too difficult. But Gallagher also didn't do too much promoting from within or encouraging designations, so that as well. Thanks.