When it comes to finding a justifiable reason to break a company policy or alter a standard procedure, there might be times to break rules depending on the situation and the nature of the rules. If it's a life or death situation, an immediate threat where safety is, you know, for example, if I was rescuing someone drowning in a pool, I wouldn't care about following the changing room one-way system to get them. However, it wouldn't be okay to break the rules for personal gain, to break the law, or to open the business up to an unacceptable risk. Most times, rules are put in for legal reason. I would never break those. Most other rules are there for a good reason, so I wouldn't choose to break or bend without a very, very good reason. I'd ask permission from a manager or whoever is higher than me to first see if it is something that is possible, if maybe there is another form or an alternative route. However, I would want to be able to put a case forward for why that rule needs change, and I wouldn't want to just dive headfirst into it. You know, the expectations are always for the client to go above and beyond, but you should also, you know, ensure that legislation was compiled for a reason. So, you know, going through standard procedures or breaking company policy doesn't really align with how I really do my day-to-day work. You know, I would definitely want to really just make sure that I'm speaking to the right people about why this rule is set this way, and if we can change it, that is fine, but otherwise I don't really want to go against something that is probably put there for a legal reason.